Sign in or 
Location: Action-Synchronicity Diagram
Discussion: mark
Category:
Discussion Forum /
General Discussion
Share this
Showing 3 posts
|
Posted Anonymously |
|
skynelson |
1. RE: mark
Jan 28 2011, 2:34 PM EST
"shouldn't the unobserved events leading to synch be running up instead of down? This is an interesting idea though."Great question. As far as the subject on the left is concerned, the unobserved events on the right fall into place retroactively. That is the intention of the backwards arrows. It is the synchronicity in the middle which determines the previous events on the right, hence the "Retroactive Event Determination". Do you find this valuable? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
2. RE: mark
Feb 3 2011, 6:17 PM EST
"Great question. As far as the subject on the left is concerned, the unobserved events on the right fall into place retroactively. That is the intention of the backwards arrows. It is the synchronicity in the middle which determines the previous events on the right, hence the "Retroactive Event Determination"."The diagram can actually work in both directions, whether you are working forward from the past, or from the future backwards "to" the past: changes in personal-perceptions change in both-directions so it is a matter of how one is explaining. I don't use the diagram, but have "kept it in mind" and often remind friends the "vast-expanse of time" which may be effected/affected by One-Point-In-Time. Appreciated finding "anyone" as interested in "experiencing and explaining" Synchs as I. Thanx. Do you find this valuable? |
