Thread started: Mar 16 2010, 5:46 PM EDT
Watch
shouldn't the unobserved events leading to synch be running up instead of down? This is an interesting idea though.
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
Show Last Reply
|
|
Last Reply:
RE: mark
By: Posted Anonymously,
Feb 3 2011, 6:17 PM EST
"Great question. As far as the subject on the left is concerned, the unobserved events on the right fall into place retroactively. That is the intention of the backwards arrows. It is the synchronicity in the middle which determines the previous events on the right, hence the "Retroactive Event Determination"." The diagram can actually work in both directions, whether you are working forward from the past, or from the future backwards "to" the past: changes in personal-perceptions change in both-directions so it is a matter of how one is explaining. I don't use the diagram, but have "kept it in mind" and often remind friends the "vast-expanse of time" which may be effected/affected by One-Point-In-Time. Appreciated finding "anyone" as interested in "experiencing and explaining" Synchs as I. Thanx.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|